Skip navigation.

Directory of Lost Causes

Posts tagged with "Britain"

Why did you abandon me here on this godawful planet of morons?

I have been in London these past few days for what Ulrich Haarburste might describe as "sundry reasons".

Yesterday, travelling on the Underground, I noticed an advertisement for some magazine or similar publication that purported to be a guide to the world in 2009. On the cover of this magazine, amongst other headlines, was the question, "Can sustainable living work in Britain?"

This seems to me a very good example of how (even) those who are forming our opinions via the media are simply unable to think straight. What does 'sustainable' mean if not something that works in the long-term? Therefore this headline could be re-written as, "Can a lifestyle that works in the long-term work in Britain?" Well, if it can't then we're screwed, aren't we? The only alternative to a sustainable lifestyle is an unsustainable lifestyle - one that won't work in the long-term. Our current lifestyle, in fact. And the only way that sustainable living won't work in Britain is because people can't be bothered to get off their fat arses and do what has to be done - the kind of contemptible apathy to which this headline seems to pander, whatever the actual conclusions of the article inside.

So let's say we take the unsustainable living... er... 'option', a few years down the road we'll all be refugees, and I doubt that there will be many other countries willing to take such apathetic, lard-arsed, criminally boring, badly-dressed, complacent, gastronomically illiterate, oafish, eructating, unsustainable scum to their bosoms, however much we might have changed our minds about immigration by then.

Another hilarious story about Britishness

Well, this is hilarious.

Of course, the real reason why plans for a national holiday to celebrate Britishness have been scrapped is because the whole idea is just too embarrassing.

Mr Wills, who worked on the original proposals, said at the time of Mr Brown's 2006 speech that he wanted there to be a day to "focus on the things that bring us together... whatever our backgrounds".


I don't want anything bringing me together with cunts like Gordon Brown. Who do these arseholes think they are, exactly?

Hopefully, their answer will soon be, "Food for beetles."

Literary Britain

, ,

The irony of Britain topping the polls in a survey on literary travel destinations is that the British themselves are such thumping philistines when it comes to literature. Or just about anything, come to think of it. Oh, also, in my opinion, English literature is amongst the most desiccated and boring in the entire world.

Last night I spoke to an old friend on the telephone. He asked if I watched S4C, the Welsh TV channel. I replied that I did not have a television. Flabbergasted, he then asked, "But what do you do with your flippin' time?!" I hope and expect that there was at least some alloy of satire in this remark, but these days, who can tell? I replied, "Well, nothing really, just write lots of stories that no one will ever read because they're too busy watching television."

The British, well, specifically the English, like to be 'amused', and can't stand metaphysics, which is why English literature is so shallow. 'Amusement', a la Jane Austen, is considered the height of cultural endeavor. What this boils down to is a kind of conceitedness, and belief that one is cleverer than everyone else on Earth, and will certainly not get tricked into taking anything but one's own cleverness seriously. Of course the evidence for that cleverness consists of nothing but the fact that one refuses to take anyone else's concerns seriously (on this score I'm recently less and less impressed with brittle British comedy). The conceitedness of English cynicism is therefore as airtight and self-perpetuating as American patriotism.

But the English are, in fact, so downright crap that we even have to get a bloody foreigner in to manifest English cleverness for us; Oscar Wilde, the epitome of the English wit, was, of course, Irish. The English themselves would have found actual manifestation of this vaguely held cleverness to be beneath their dignity. (In other words, they didn't have the ability.)

These days, even the very hollow cleverness that once existed has been dumbed down, so that the conceitedness and cynicism are as dull as some blokey journalist's warm beer.

Can you tell how much I hate this country?

To be fair, in terms of literature, we do have a certain amount of variety on our side. The desiccated nature of our culture sometimes gives rise to a kind of stilted eccentricity that does not seem to have a counterpart elsewhere in the world: A.A. Milne, Lewis Carroll... Er, maybe that's it, actually. And perhaps the best English literature is children's literature, since the tyrannical and very tiresome light of reason reigns elsewhere with such completeness, it seems as if it is only in or through childhood that the English imagination can be expressed. I'd favour E. Nesbit's The Enchanted Castle over, say, Thomas Hardy, any day.

And as to Shakespeare, I remain unconvinced. He still seems to me like a bloke who could write some good one-liners, but I've never found the stories at all engaging. What did he actually convey, apart from the fact that he was the Bard, and therefore pretty damned clever? People (and critics) will sometimes give someone like H.P. Lovecraft as an example of a bad writer, because of certain things that, stylistically, you are apparently not supposed to do, and because he didn't flatter society with amusing comedies of manners, but at least Lovecraft conveys something in particular, whereas, to me, Shakespeare conveys nothing at all. And Shakespeare is the jewel in the passage to India of English literature, apparently. No wonder all the rest of it is so crap.

I wish I didn't even know who Julie Burchill was

, , , ...

I don't know why I've just happened on this clip, but I have. All I can do, when I see this sort of thing, is think about how much I hate my native land. And once again post a link to Momus's essay on Britain, 'Nasty, British and Short'. Since some people may not click on the link, or may be put off by the length of the essay, I shall quote the most essential part of it here:

I recently saw Julien Temple's new Sex Pistols documentary, 'The Filth And The Fury'. It's a good film, with a few spine-tingling moments, but seeing the whole vomity, gobby story again was like drowning, and seeing Britain pass before my eyes. The livid hatred, the violence, the fear of sex (a value McLaren, the film's villain, wrote into the band's blueprint but Rotten disowned, famously declaring it 'two and a half minutes of squelching noises'), the adolescent nihilism (still hailed as cutting edge when it reappears in the work of PRML SCRM, Unkle, and the massed ranks of punky yuppies in combat trousers)... The film just underlined my belief that punk paved the way for Margaret Thatcher, that punk hated sex, that punk played into the hands of the tabloids (still the world's most Brutish, just like the censorship laws and just like the football hooligans) and that punk is one of the things that makes modern Britain so boring, so reactionary and so brutish.

Something else struck me. Lydon's evil cackle at the beginning of 'Holidays In The Sun' reveals him as an innocent who has decided to incarnate a malevolent view of human nature in the classic manner of the Dickensian pantomime villain. In The Sex Pistols, Lydon incarnates the British contempt for human nature. He becomes a parody of the malady, and is an immediate success in Britain. When, later, he and his nemesis McLaren try to embody the remedy to the Brutish disease, making records like 'Metal Box' and 'Duck Rock', the Brutish stay away in droves, fail to buy, and use bargepoles when parlaying. Bow Wow Wow with their sexy Eiffel towers and their odes to Louis Quattorze and home taping stiff too. The Brutish do not want the remedy. They want the malady. The remedy is always foreign, it involves a loss of identity. The malady, however horrible, is forever Brutish.

'Don't know what I want but I know how to get it/I wanna destroy the passerby'. Have you ever wanted to destroy the passerby, dear reader? I have frequently wanted to fuck the passerby, but never to destroy him or her. But dilute that sentiment a bit, until you simply wish to be unkind, unencouraging and unpleasant to the passerby, and you have in a nutshell the feeling of British life.


Watching the clip of Tony Prince, to which I posted a link, I asked myself which part of the British dichotomy I was - the middle-aged presenter, or the young, abusive, passer-by. Of course, immediately, the desire is to say that I am the young man, because, in a sly way, he is the 'victim' here. I'm sure Julie Burchill would say so. He is the 'target' of all that is reactionary in Britain. It is a moral imperative to side with him against the old fart. But, after all, I know I'm not 'cool' enough to be the lad. I must, therefore, be Tony Prince. Oh well. I almost have to sigh about it. Until it occurs to me that I have much more sympathy with Tony Prince, anyway, and, although we can all be judgemental and say he should have risen above the abuse, I thought his comeback was as dignified as lowering oneself ever can be. It wasn't witty, exactly, but it was good enough. The lad will never know how reactionary he is. He is the 'punk', and punk is subversive by definition. And subversive is good by definition, whoever you shit on, and however badly you treat your fellow human beings.

So, yeah, maybe I'm just Tony Prince.

Then again, I don't even have that middle-class dignity and... I want to say 'repose', though don't know if that even means anything in this context, but I'll say it anyway... repose that comes from whatever it is that the lad undoubtedly sees (not that he sees anything) as uncoolness and self-satisfaction.

In fact, I am both lad and Tony Prince. And neither.

I was thinking earlier, because of my other posts today, about regionalism. I grew up in Devon, in England, but it was not until adult life that I actually became aware of the kind of nasty, petty regionalism and tribalism that defines English and British life. Catholic/Protestant, working-class/middle-class, Manchester City/Manchester United, North/South and so on - all these divisions meant nothing to me. I was oblivious.

I went to university in Durham. I was looking forward to seeing a new part of England. The idea of spending a period of my life in the land of Geordies was peculiarly exciting, I suppose just because it would mean experiencing and learning about a part of the world I had only known by rumour before. "Getting to know you/Getting to know all about you/Getting to like you/Getting to hope you like me/Getting to know you/Putting it my way, but nicely/You are precisely/My cup of tea."

I wasn't prepared for the amount of hatred that existed in Durham and the North East generally for Southerners. (I'd never even thought of myself as a Southerner; I didn't know I was one until then.) I felt - that is, I learned to feel - much of the time like saying to people, as per Withnail and Marlowe(?) from Withnail and I, "I'm not from London, you know." Except I wouldn't have been lying. It probably wouldn't have helped even if I had been believed. Before I left Durham, amongst other incidents, a French exchange student was beaten to death in the street by locals.

I don't suppose it would have helped him, either.

And now, I wish I still never knew about the divisions I've named above. I wish I had never been made an expert in them, and made to feel they were a part of me, made to realise they have always been a part of me, and I wish I didn't even know who Julie Burchill was.

Journeys by Bus

, , ,

I phone the 'customer service' number for the Cardiff-Swansea Shuttle 100 bus, 01792 572255. I ask if the timetable on the website is current, since it has the words 'winter timetable' in the URL, and I can't find a corresponding 'summer timetable', and even here in rainy Wales, I'm fairly sure that the beginning of July must be classed as 'summer'.

"As far as I know, the timetable is current," comes the reply. It's not a very reassuring answer. "If it's the same one I'm looking at."

Well, how big is that 'if', exactly?

"It says 'winter timetable' here," I reiterate, "so I just wondered if it was still valid."

"Does it have May the 6th on it?"

I look. I can't see any date written anywhere.

"I can't see any date anywhere," I say. "I'm looking at the Firstgroup website. Is that right?"

"Yes."

"So, that should be the right timetable then?"

Throughout this exchange I have sensed - without too much surprise, unfortunately - a general unwillingness to communicate. It's almost as if this man resents that fact that people should phone a number that is advertised as being for 'customer service' asking questions. And now there ensues such a poisonous silence in answer to my tentative question that I can virtually see the fissures in the cancerous old man's greying lips as he presses them tighter. It's possible that the man hates me because he's Welsh and I'm English, and I'm just ridiculous enough to feel guilty for that. It's also possible that this concentrated sulphur of silence is simply due to the fact that the man is British and works for a bus company. Service, in Britain, is... well, there's an old joke that goes like this: "I didn't come here to be insulted." "Well, where do you normally go?" British 'service' is basically where people go to be insulted.

I made my excuses and hung up, reminding myself how foolish I had been actually to expect anyone to be at all helpful on the end of a British 'helpline'.

This whole process of planning my journey to London by bus has taken me a few days. I did not expect it to take so long. Things have changed. Of course, I did start by looking things up on the Internet, but all the 'journey planners' turned out to be entirely useless. Like bureaucracy in the film Brazil (and in actual life), each webpage I found simply referred me to another. The actual task of planning a journey had been 'out-sourced' so many times that there was nothing left but the process of out-sourcing; the service itself, which should have been at its end, had been forgotten.

The assumption in this age being, however, that everything is done instantaneously at the click of a mouse, human service has atrophied shockingly. No one knows how to answer a phone any more, or answer a question. In the past, if I wanted to plan a coach journey, which I often did, I would simply make one phonecall, ask a number of questions of one person, who had the amazing ability to tell me times, prices and the locations of stops, and my journey-planning, and booking, was complete. The people were not always cheery - this is Britain, after all - but at least they could do their job.

I've had to resort to photographs of timetables in bus shelters and bus stops to help me fill in the final pieces of the puzzle. There is something refreshing in walking to a bus stop and seeing, laid out clearly, all in one place, the times and destinations of buses, without having to be redirected to anything, without having to turn a switch or click an icon, and without having to talk to some sour old cunt who is determined to find some reason to hate you because he hates the job he's too shrivelled and pickled with resentment and mediocrity to be able to do.

Who has not died a little in Milton Keynes?

, , ,

I've just come across this excellent review of three books all on the subject of cross-Atlantic politics. I'm afraid it's already three years old, but its content is still very relevant. I'm not sure what I'd call my forte, but political analysis is not it, therefore I don't think I can hope to better the analysis on offer in this review, and I would urge people to read it, if they have a moment.

There is much talk, in the review, of Britain's halfway position between Europe and the United States. I must say, I'm not sure that our position is exactly halfway. We seem to be closer to the US than maps generally indicate. I would prefer we were closer to Europe. American hostility to 'welfare' (and yes, I do encounter it) never ceases to amaze me. When I come across it, I know I have stumbled upon something forged in a very different cultural crucible than the one that forged me*.



When I see this kind of thing, however, I tend to find it rather ironic. Well, I know that in the case of Al Murray, the comedy is meant to be ironic, but that's not exactly what I mean. There still is, in Britain, an obsession with America, and it's telling that, as far as such things can be ascertained, it seems that Britain is the most American of all European countries. We insist on our difference to Europe (or the rest of Europe) and we insist on our difference to America, but of what is our difference to Europe comprised if not of that fact that we are more American? Which then begs the question, of what is our alleged difference to America comprised, and why are we so proud as to insist on it? Of course, it's perfectly allowable for Britain to be more or other than the sum of the two theoretical parts Europe + America, but in many ways it appears that we're less, having not the wealth and drive of America and not the social benefits of Europe. If we can't point to what is both good and different about Britain, I would suggest that we are 'protesting too much' when we attack America from a specifically 'British' perspective. We wish to differentiate ourselves because we know how much we have already ignobly lost. Moreover, rather than then try to differentiate ourselves from Europe, it might be more to our advantage to nurture what little we have left in common with Europe.

Of course, if I were to point to the things that I think are good and different about Britain, they would be things that no one gave a toss about anyway - especially not the British - so I won't bother.



*I suppose this indicates some sort of paradox in what I've written, but life's like that.

Making the world feel less English since 2004

, , , ...

First of all, apologies are in order to just about everyone for just about everything.

Secondly, I'd like you all to think of England.

I know I do, frequently.

It is actually a scientific fact that it's ridiculous of me to be critical of England, unto which Stevie Smith likened happiness, however, I live only to be ridiculous in the eyes and bosoms of all those who behold me, and so, let me proceed.

First of all, I've linked to this before, but I do think it's an excellent essay and expresses a lot of what I also would like to express. I differ from the opinions of Momus management here and there. For instance, it looks like I'm not a real man, since I don't really like gadgets (apart from my digital camera). But that's not really a surprise to anyone, now, is it? Errr... Am I referring to the same essay? Haven't got time to re-read it. To continue...

Oh yes, so there's not much left to say after that, but I shall say it, anyway.

The other day, lamenting the existence of my blog to a friend whilst soaking a whole boxful of mansize tissues, I found myself confronted with the following reply:

I like your blog. I think you should carry on writing it. It makes the world feel less English.


(Before I go further, let me point out I'm not treating England and Britain as interchangable, even though they are... No, I'm just joking.)

A couple of days later I came across the following collection of British adverts on Youtube:



Now, I do actually have a sense of humour somewhere, if I could only find it, BUT, just how many layers of 'brilliant' English/British irony (everyone wants some if it's irony we're talking about) are there in these adverts? What finally comes out on top? The beer is being sold as 'no nonsense'. That's what comes out on top. I'm not having a go at Peter Kay. He's talented and funny enough not to need my permission to exist. But let's analyse in a very (un)English way, the first of these adverts {actually the last one is not bad, and perhaps shows the genuinely good side to British (but not English) 'no nonsense'}. Okay, I'm not well up on sports, but some kind of international sporting event. Some foreign Johnny types do some fancy twirly things off the diving board. Then it's 'good old' John Smith from 'Great Britain'. "What can he do?" we're asked, almost as if it's a rhetorical question. Because we're crap, aren't we? (Is the subtext.) And what he does is 'a running bomb'. The foetal version of a bellyflop, or perhaps the Dambusters version, eh? Anyway, needless to say he wins. That's the spirit! And, the advertising slogan for this horrible beer that tastes like Fairy Liquid is 'No nonsense'. Really? I think there's quite a lot of nonsense in there. However. 'No nonsense' is what the British, and specifically the English, pride ... I want to say 'ourselves', to be inclusive, but I can't, because I don't share these sentiments... is what they pride themselves on. What does 'no nonsense' really mean? Not trying. Being crap. Hating other people for being better than you. Hating to see your mates do well. Etcetera. He hasn't been in the pub since Tuesday, his new girlfriend really has him under the thumb etcetera etcetera. (Oh yeah, the one about the old people's home is particularly horrible. Funny? Didn't raise a titter.)

Sorry, but I don't find it funny. Even as a joke, it's lazy. How ironic can a pint of beer be?

I do enjoy a drink, but... there is more to life than beer and 'a running bomb'. There really is. Open your eyes, if you don't believe me. There is... Well, let's start with Momus. There's Momus, criminally underrated Scottish musician and blogger. There's.... Justin Isis, Mark Samuels (ha ha, no I'm not going to just list all my friends, sorry), Bruno Schulz, Juana Molina, Chinese landscape painting, flying gliders, entomology, Arthur Machen, that really grim Polish artist who was knifed whose name I can never spell and I'm probably embarrassing myself and getting the country wrong, too, Maruo Suehiro, C.G. Jung, Stanislav Grof, Gurdjieff, Kate Bush, Sifow, Maeda Ken, Zhongguo Wawa, Jorge Luis Borges, Jeremy Reed, The Tindersticks, some people that I have unforgivably not kept in touch with (sorry again), Nagai Kafu, Tanizaki Jun'ichiro, Naruse Mikio, Takahashi Rumiko, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Ivor Cutler, William Blake, Yang Lian, Wang Wei, Li Bai, tai chi, Six Feet Under, the Peter Harris Experience, Andre Gide, Immanuel Kant, Fucking Amal, Thomas Ligotti, Kierkegaard, Ann Kavan, tree frogs, duckweed, two-tone, wolf-children, Marcus Aurelius and Norman Lovett in my living room alone. And that's still a very, very biased list, it has to be said. (Oh, and Kahlil Gibran, he quipped.)

And some of them are even English.

And some of them are even British.

Errr. I think that's all I really needed to say. I'll leave the last word to Kit Wright, a poet. I know nothing about Kit Wright except that he or she wrote the following poem. (If there are any copyright problems, will Kit Wright please get in touch with me, and I promise that the John Smiths will be on me for the evening):

Everyone Hates the English

Everyone hates the English,
Including the English, they sneer
At each other for being so English,
So what are they doing here,
The English? It's thick with the English,
All over the country. Why?
Everyone ever born English
Should shut up, or fuck off, or die.

Anyone ever born English
Should hold their extraction in scorn
And apologise all over England
For ever at all being born,
For that's how it is, being English;
Fodder for any old scoff
That England might be a nice country
If only the English fucked off!

I've hated Britain for a very long time. Britain, you lead the world in soullessness.

,

I don't feel like being articulate about this, but I've just read this news story. I honestly have no words to express what this kind of thing makes me feel. Let me say then, a few things that I'm not. I'm not impressed by the bullies in this incident. I'm not at all inclined to feel sympathetic towards them or rush to their defence. I'm not apologetic about seeing them as ignorant scum who should be sterilised. I'm not inclined, either, to view them as an isolated minority, but rather to view them as the cold, evil heart of British culture. Britain, which brought the world industry, mass-production and generally laid the groundwork for the cynical, materialistic consumerism that makes the world go round today. Britain which has produced young people who have nothing to believe in any more and no soul left, only a sneering, murderous, snobbish, shallow hatred of all otherness and a very mistaken belief in their own cleverness and betterness.

(PS. I was right again about Southpark being boring by attacking Goths, wasn't I? People should listen to me more often.)